Reservoir Dogs

RESERVOIR DOGS, written by Quentin Tarantino, is definitely a pulp film. The main difference between his film and other pulp films is that RD seems to hide some of its cheesiness, and he’s able to mask a lot of his story so that you really can’t recognize it as such. Also, many pulp films aren’t nearly as successful as RD, and so it’s a lot harder to see why this film is pulp.

To begin, the film isn’t very sleazy. For the most part, all the characters, aside from their criminal sides, are pretty normal guys. But I think the fact that Mr. Blonde goes psycho definitely suggests gratuitous violence. But that’s what makes RD so popular, the fact that the violence, although very prevalent, isn’t really there to be exploited. In most pulp films, the violence drives the story, not the story. What’s unique about RD is that while it does have extreme violence, its very character and story driven. There’s a very strong reason for it. It lets us in on who the characters are. What’s also interesting to note is that some of the more intense violence doesn’t even happen on screen. Mr. Blonde shooting all the people in the bank, Mr. Blonde cutting the cops ear off, Mr. White shooting Mr. Orange. None of it is seen, but we can hear it, and that almost makes it worse.

For sure, some of the story ideas are stolen from other works, such as CITY ON FIRE. Tarantino took a good chunk of that film and translated it into his film, which I think works a lot better in RD than it did in CITY ON FIRE. What’s also very pulp about RD is the fact that it was extremely low budget. Almost everything was shot in one warehouse, and there are a couple of small sets that look like they’re inside, which means all they really needed to do was gather some props and get some lights. All in all, most of the money was spent on the cast, which is quite unprecedented in a pulp film, but since they spent very little money on the story, set, costumes, and props (one of the cars was actually Harvey Keitel’s) that it easily qualifies as having that pulp-like budget.

None of the characters are really morally ambiguous, they’re all bad guys. But we start to care for almost all of them, not Mr. Blonde, but everyone else. We know they’re robbers and killers, but we don’t seem to care. Since they like Madonna and the songs of the 70’s, they’re okay in my book. That’s something that only a pulp film can do: take a character that normally wouldn’t be sympathetic and turn them into the protagonist.

The film also has a lot of stereotyping against black people. The film always seems to reference them in negative ways, whether it’s about how black men treat women, how black women treat men, how black men work a job. And I guess you could say that the film does exploit a little of everything the men talk about it. The entire opening scene, when Mr. Pink starts ragging on waitresses because everyone wants him to tip. Although I still tip, Mr. Pink does make a good point, and I wouldn’t be surprised if there were people out there who felt the same way.

RESERVOIR DOGS was really one of the first groundbreaking pulp films to come along in the 90’s. Its one main difference between this film and other pulp scripts is that this one was good. It was good in the sense that it actually had a full story, character arcs and character development, and was shot amazingly well. It’s those three aspects that make it so hard to tell if this is a pulp film or not.